Remember, true science deals with facts -- observable, testable, reproducible under controlled conditions. The origin of things is not observable, not testable, not reproducible. This places the question of origins outside of science. (How To Handle Evolution by J. W. Jepson, D.Min.) Molecule to Man
For almost a hundred of those years it’s been drummed into the public consciousness that we are little more than evolved apes with the ability to think and walk upright. But these brilliant scholars don’t even know at this advanced date when and how life arose, or in what form, much less whether it had a power to reproduce and a need to evolve! In other words, the origin of species remains a mystery. Take for example the New Darwinist’s much repeated opinion that at some point in the distant past, inert, lifeless matter turned itself into a living organism of some kind from which all others have evolved. Can you imagine that? Dead lifeless matter coming to life? On its own? All by itself? It’s just insane. The Origin of Life: A Problem for Evolution
Scientists who promote a spontaneous origin of life without a creator begin with the assumption that God does not exist. Then they devise an imaginative scenario whereby molecules come together to form a living being. Since the evolutionists have an “explanation”, they use it to insist that life can arise without God. This is simply circular reasoning. Instantaneous Transition From Non-Life to Life
If evolution is true, then this transition must have happened one time in the past, and it would have taken place in an instant, not millions of years. Evolution .. The Greatest Act Of Faith Of All Time
The influence of evolutionary theory on fields far removed from biology is one of the most spectacular examples in history of how a highly speculative idea for which there is really no hard scientific evidence can come to fashion the thinking of a whole society and dominate the outlook of any age... (Denton, Evolution: a Theory in Crisis, p358).
For an anthology of well-documented quotations of 50 Nobel Laureates And Other Great Scientists Who Believe In God, see the free e-book compiled by Tihomir Dimitrov
Creation vs. Evolution
(The Basics Explained)
The "law" of physics cannot explain the origin of the laws of physics. A Skeptical Inquiry into Origins
If one simply looks at the facts with an open mind and no preconceptions, in simple humility, it is impossible to come to the conclusion of evolution. The structure of evolution has been built up over the last six thousand years and certain spiritual forces want YOU to accept it unquestioningly, without looking too closely at it. Is Evolution Science?
I have seen many papers by evolutionary biologists presenting evidence and arguing about various mechanisms of evolution, but I have not seen a single paper in a scientific journal seriously considering the question of whether evolution is true and attempting to answer it by putting the theory to an unbiased test. Is Creation Scientific?
The motivation of the evolutionist is religious in nature, not scientific. His "god", so to speak, is man. His doctrine is that man is the highest ascent of the struggle of evolution, and that he's the master of his own destiny. Christianity Provided the Foundation for Science Through the Ages
For those of us who studied un-revised history (or so we thought), the latest texts as compared to what actually happened, are shocking. The average kid in class, however, just learns it. So take a little True or False quiz: Defeating Darwinism
A lawyer that studied the literature closely and concluded that what keeps the "evolution-as-fact" dogma alive is not scientific evidence at all, but rather a commitment to the philosophy of naturalism. Icons of Evolution
Lies and Distortions Masquerading as Truth in the Halls of Science. Human Fossils
We have even fewer examples of evolutionary transition than we had in Darwin’s time. There Ought to be A Law Against Evolution
(And There Is...the second law of thermodynamics) Origin by Random Chance or Master Plan
Could random natural selection keep hitting upon the same solution in terribly complex structures, or is an intelligent designer using the same blueprint where it is appropriate a better answer? The Mathematical Impossibility of the Theory of Evolution
NASA scientists believe that the smallest number of parts possible in an organism considered to be living is 400, which must be in the correct order. Even when we work at the staggering rate of one billion trials per second throughout the whole universe for a period of 300 billion years, we can only achieve 5x10^105 combinations. That is well short of the 788x10372 combinations needed to be sure that we can arrive at the correct combination to start our very simple form of life. In fact, impossibly simple at just 200 pieces Darwins Black Box
Simply put, Behe, a reputable scientist from a reputable institution has found a complex organ, which could not possibly have been formed by numerous, successive, slight modifications. The History Channel’s Ape to Man —Tales They Will Tell
From the recounting narrated in this production, one would assume that director Nic Young and his crew simply walked back in time with their cameras, and taped remarkable footage of these alleged ape-like creatures. The make-up, scenery, and story-telling are superb. But how many young people will recognize it as simply that—story-telling. From a scientific viewpoint, exactly how much can one tell from fossilized bones? Evolution of the Digestive System?—I Can’t Swallow That
If the human digestive system were compared to a building, where energy is needed to provide heat and light, and plumbing is needed to provide water and to dispose of waste, it would require experienced engineers, master electricians, skilled carpenters, and well-trained plumbers—all working from the same set of blueprints—to construct a functional building. The human digestive system is infinitely more complex, and yet we are to believe it is simply the product of evolution? Where Did the First Birds Come From?
Darwin said "If it could be demonstrated that any complex organ existed which could not possibly have been formed by numerous, successive, slight modifications, my theory would absolutely break down." Here are two of several features of birds that have presented enough difficulty to meet Darwin's challenge. Animals That Prove Creation
There are many animals existing today that totally defies evolution by their very existence. This chapter will give examples of some of these animals and explain the problems they give the theory of evolution. Natural Selection
is often referred to as 'survival of the fittest' or, more recently, 'reproduction of the fittest'. Many people are confused about it, thinking that evidence for natural selection is automatically evidence for the idea that molecules turned into microbes, which became millipedes, magnolias and managing directors. Walking Amidst The Dinosaurs
Contrary to popular opinion, dinosaurs do not present a problem for creationists. In fact, quite the opposite is true. It is evolutionists who have a problem. While they continue to maintain that ‘no man ever existed in the age of the reptiles’, the evidence documents exactly the opposite. Ancient Dinosaur Depictions in Stone
From ancient art on Mesopotamian cylinder seals, Cave walls, Pottery, Egyptian Seal, Roman Mosaics and Rock Drawings to Iron Sculptures, Clay Figurines, Saxon Shields, and Tomb Engravings. The evidence (spanning thousands of years) is hard to ignore.. People did see and Draw Dinosaurs. The Footprints of Dragons
Almost all our early ancestors believed the earth was inhabited, especially in unknown regions, by dragons. Where did they get such an idea? Did it stem from a universal human imagination? An inherited need or instinct? An inherited subconscious memory of dinosaurs? All these suggestions have been made, and taken seriously by groups of people. I believe dragons are the reflection, sometimes embellished through retelling but mostly historical, of actual physical encounters of human beings with dinosaurs. To be forced to believe one conclusion – that everything in the universe happened by chance – would violate the very objectivity of science itself." Dr. Wernher von Braun, father of America’s space program. Anthropic Principles
Scientists are now finding that the universe in which we live is like a diamond studded Rolex, except the universe is even more precisely designed than the watch. In fact, the universe is specifically tweaked to enable life on earth. A Planet with scores of improbable and inter-dependent life- supporting conditions that make it a tiny oasis in a vast and hostile universe. The extent of the universe’s fine-tuning makes the Anthropic Principle perhaps the most powerful argument for the existence of God. The Radiometric Dating Deception
what exactly is wrong with radiometric dating? How can we explain the fact that these dating methods do, in fact, yield dates in the hundreds of millions of years? Why is it that so many museums and textbooks confidently give ages for fossils in the hundreds of millions of years? Evidence For A Young World
Here are a dozen natural phenomena which conflict with the evolutionary idea that the universe is billions of years old. Much more young-world evidence exists, but I have chosen these items for brevity and simplicity. Some of the items on this list can be reconciled with an old universe only by making a series of improbable and unproven assumptions; others can fit in only with a young universe. Scientific Evidence Disproves Evolution Theory
If several factors limit the earth's age to a few thousand years, the earth cannot be older than a few thousand years! Even if a few indicators seem to show a greater age for the earth, it takes only ONE fact to prove the earth is young. Evolution’s Big Bang
By concentrating on explaining the minutiae, naturalistic thinkers often miss the clear possibility of intelligent design precisely because they don't expect to find any. Darwinism Discredited By Real Scientists
Too many Christians, when confronted with the argument that real scientists support Darwin’s conclusions, throw in the towel for lack of knowledge. Huse’s list of pioneering, Bible-believing scientists comes to their aid. It’s comprehensive, historically reliable, and demands wide distribution. The Holocaust Wish
Believe that man is no more than an evolved bacteria? .. Well Here is The Next step. At the 109th meeting of the Texas Academy of Science at Lamar University in Beaumont, Texas, Dr. Eric Pianka insisted the Earth would not be able to sustain life without drastic measures. He proposed the only solution was to eliminate most of the world’s population and suggested airborne Ebola, which it is both highly lethal and kills in days, instead of years. He also received a standing ovation. | 
HIGHLY Recommended Reading 
